Current:Home > MarketsSocial Security checks face $17,400 cut if program isn't shored up, study says -ProsperityStream Academy
Social Security checks face $17,400 cut if program isn't shored up, study says
View
Date:2025-04-16 00:11:44
Social Security is on track to cut benefits to retirees in 2033, when its trust fund reserves are forecast to be depleted. The reduction could be substantial, according to a new analysis.
Unless the program is shored up before 2033, the typical newly retired, dual-earner couple will see their Social Security checks reduced by $17,400 annually, or $1,450 per month, according to the report from the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.
A newly retired couple with one earner would see a cut of $13,100, the report said. The analysis, which is based on current dollars, doesn't forecast the impact on newly retired single earners, but the Social Security Administration has estimated that benefits will be cut by 23% in 2033 unless the program is strengthened.
Those cuts could prove devastating to roughly 50 million older Americans who receive Social Security checks, with the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget forecasting that "senior poverty would rise significantly upon insolvency." Still, there are plenty of proposals to fix Social Security's looming funding shortfall, either by raising taxes or increasing the retirement age, or a combination of the two.
The current average monthly benefit check for single earners is about $1,800, according to the Social Security Administration.
"Smash the cap"
Some Democratic lawmakers and left-leaning policy experts say there's a simple fix: "Smash the cap," which refers to the Social Security tax cap.
That cap, a feature of the program since its start in the 1930s following the Great Depression, means that any income over that level isn't subject to the Social Security payroll tax, which is 6.2% for workers and an additional 6.2% for employers. In 2023, the tax cap stands at $160,200, which means any income above that amount is exempt from the payroll tax.
But critics say this places the burden of funding Social Security on low- and middle-income earners, while higher-income Americans get a break. For instance, a middle-income worker earning less than the $160,200 cap in 2023 will pay an effective tax rate that is six times higher than that of a millionaire.
Eliminating the cap would subject higher earnings to payroll tax, generating additional revenue for Social Security and helping to stabilize its finances, proponents say.
Raise the retirement age
Some Republican lawmakers and right-leaning experts are opposed to higher taxes, however, and instead have proposed raising the retirement age.
Last year, some Republican lawmakers floated the idea of lifting the retirement age to 70 — from its current age of 66 to 67, depending on one's birth year — citing the "miracle" of longer life expectancies.
Yet critics point out that many people can't work until they are 70, due to health issues or other reasons. And even if an older worker could remain in the labor force until they were 70, it still would amount to a benefits cut because they would be losing between three to four years of Social Security checks as a result.
- In:
- Social Security
veryGood! (9653)
Related
- New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
- Claim to Fame Reveals Relatives of Two and a Half Men and Full House Stars
- Kris Jenner Shares Results of Ovary Tumor After Hysterectomy
- Justin Long Admits He S--t the Bed Next to Wife Kate Bosworth in TMI Confession
- SFO's new sensory room helps neurodivergent travelers fight flying jitters
- Summer 'snow' in Philadelphia breaks a confusing 154-year-old record
- ‘One screen, two movies': Conflicting conspiracy theories emerge from Trump shooting
- Trump's 17-year-old granddaughter Kai says it was heartbreaking when he was shot
- Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
- U.S. Navy exonerates Black sailors unjustly punished in WWII Port Chicago explosion aftermath
Ranking
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- 'The Boys' adds content warning on Season 4 finale after Trump assassination attempt
- Stegosaurus fossil fetches nearly $45M, setting record for dinosaur auctions
- Climate change is making days longer, according to new research
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Stegosaurus fossil fetches nearly $45M, setting record for dinosaur auctions
- Alaska judge who resigned in disgrace didn’t disclose conflicts in 23 cases, investigation finds
- Summer 'snow' in Philadelphia breaks a confusing 154-year-old record
Recommendation
New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
Claim to Fame Reveals Relatives of Two and a Half Men and Full House Stars
California first state to get federal funds for hydrogen energy hub to help replace fossil fuels
Crooks' warning before rampage: 'July 13 will be my premiere, watch as it unfolds'
What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
Book excerpt: Same As It Ever Was by Claire Lombardo
Don't believe Texas is ready for the SEC? Nick Saban does. So should you.
Movie armorer seeks dismissal of her conviction or new trial in fatal shooting by Alec Baldwin